The Lau v. Nichols decision in 1974 led to which federal act requiring schools to take action to overcome language barriers?

Get ready for the NYSTCE 116 ESOL CST. Learn with flashcards and multiple choice questions, each with hints and explanations. Prepare effectively for your exam!

Multiple Choice

The Lau v. Nichols decision in 1974 led to which federal act requiring schools to take action to overcome language barriers?

Explanation:
This item tests how Lau v. Nichols led to a federal action that ensures language access in schools. The Supreme Court's decision highlighted that students with limited English proficiency were not receiving equal educational opportunities if schools provided no language support. In response, Congress enacted the Equal Educational Opportunities Act in 1974, which requires school districts to take appropriate action to overcome language barriers that impede equal access to education. This includes providing language instruction programs and services for English Language Learners so all students can participate in and benefit from the same educational opportunities as their peers. While other laws address civil rights or accessibility more broadly, this act specifically answers the language-barrier issue raised by Lau v. Nichols.

This item tests how Lau v. Nichols led to a federal action that ensures language access in schools. The Supreme Court's decision highlighted that students with limited English proficiency were not receiving equal educational opportunities if schools provided no language support. In response, Congress enacted the Equal Educational Opportunities Act in 1974, which requires school districts to take appropriate action to overcome language barriers that impede equal access to education. This includes providing language instruction programs and services for English Language Learners so all students can participate in and benefit from the same educational opportunities as their peers. While other laws address civil rights or accessibility more broadly, this act specifically answers the language-barrier issue raised by Lau v. Nichols.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy